This is the eleventh part of the ILP series. For your convenience you can find other parts in the table of contents in Part 1 – Boolean algebra
Last time we implemented a selection sort in ILP. Today we are going to do something similar: we are going to implement counting sort.
Table of Contents
Introduction
As you probably remember from your classes, counting sort is useful when we try to sort values from small and finite set. It is for instance great for sorting people by their age because there are no people older than 200 years so we have at most two hundred possible values (and we can confine this range even more). What’s more, counting sort time complexity is linear so in theory it should work faster than selection sort. So let’s begin.
Problem definition
First, let’s define necessary variables:
      
We have 
 variables 
 to sort. Every 
 variable has a value from set 
. Set 
 has 
 variables 
. Variables 
 represents the final result.
We are going to sort variables 
 using the knowledge that they all come from the set 
.
Algorithm
Our algorithm will have the following steps:
- Compare every 
 with every 
 - Sum results of comparisons to know how many values are there actually
 - Construct the final vector
 
Comparing
We define the following variables:
      ![]()
We basically try to find them number of values 
 in vector 
. After this step we have 
 different variables.
Summing results
Now we need to know how many values are there so we define the following variables:
      ![Rendered by QuickLaTeX.com \[ c_{y_i} = \sum_{j=1}^{n} c_{y_i = x_j} \]](../../../../wp-content/ql-cache/quicklatex.com-525da98e32b50744803dcde8de09bf77_l3.png)
Now we know that there are exactly 
 values 
 in vector 
. We now need to aggregate the results to be able to reconstruct the vector, so we define the partial sums:
      ![Rendered by QuickLaTeX.com \[ s_{i} = \sum_{j=1}^{i} c_{y_i} \]](../../../../wp-content/ql-cache/quicklatex.com-2c0ed077af0bae9e00889b1728553997_l3.png)
This value tells us that there are exactly 
 elements not greater than 
. This might be a bit tricky so let’s consider an example first.
Example
Let’s imagine that we want to sort the following vector:
      ![]()
We can see that 
 and we have 
 values. We also assume the following set of possible values:
      ![]()
Basically we assumed that our values are not greater than 
 and not less than 
. It is worth noting that in 
 there is no variables equal to 
 but this is how counting sort works. We now have the following results of comparisons:
      
Now we need to aggregate these values:
      
Right now we know that there are exactly 
 variables in vector 
 equal to 
. Now we sum the results:
      
And now we know that there are exactly 
 values not greater than 
 in vector 
, 
 values not greater than 
 and so on.
Constructing the result
Every 
 variable tells us how many values not greater than 
 there are in the original vector. We can utilize this knowledge to put values in correct places:
      ![]()
In our example it is:
      
This works in the following way: for every position 
 we ask whether there are at least 
 elements not greater than 
 and we choose minimum of 
 values. So we basically try to insert values in their places and we need to use 
 function to select lowest possible value for every place.
Complexity
As you can see, this algorithm needs 
 temporary variables. Assuming that 
 our algorithm uses linear space. If it is not true that 
 then it makes no sense using this algorithm but the same happens with casual counting sort. There is no use to sort numbers using this algorithm when the domain is really big.
Summary
We already know two sorting algorithms. Their implementation is rather straightforward and really resembles the imperative counterparts. As an exercise you might want to implement other imperative algorithms using similar approach.