This is the eleventh part of the ILP series. For your convenience you can find other parts in the table of contents in Part 1 – Boolean algebra
Last time we implemented a selection sort in ILP. Today we are going to do something similar: we are going to implement counting sort.
Table of Contents
Introduction
As you probably remember from your classes, counting sort is useful when we try to sort values from small and finite set. It is for instance great for sorting people by their age because there are no people older than 200 years so we have at most two hundred possible values (and we can confine this range even more). What’s more, counting sort time complexity is linear so in theory it should work faster than selection sort. So let’s begin.
Problem definition
First, let’s define necessary variables:
We have variables
to sort. Every
variable has a value from set
. Set
has
variables
. Variables
represents the final result.
We are going to sort variables using the knowledge that they all come from the set
.
Algorithm
Our algorithm will have the following steps:
- Compare every
with every
- Sum results of comparisons to know how many values are there actually
- Construct the final vector
Comparing
We define the following variables:
We basically try to find them number of values in vector
. After this step we have
different variables.
Summing results
Now we need to know how many values are there so we define the following variables:
Now we know that there are exactly values
in vector
. We now need to aggregate the results to be able to reconstruct the vector, so we define the partial sums:
This value tells us that there are exactly elements not greater than
. This might be a bit tricky so let’s consider an example first.
Example
Let’s imagine that we want to sort the following vector:
We can see that and we have
values. We also assume the following set of possible values:
Basically we assumed that our values are not greater than and not less than
. It is worth noting that in
there is no variables equal to
but this is how counting sort works. We now have the following results of comparisons:
Now we need to aggregate these values:
Right now we know that there are exactly variables in vector
equal to
. Now we sum the results:
And now we know that there are exactly values not greater than
in vector
,
values not greater than
and so on.
Constructing the result
Every variable tells us how many values not greater than
there are in the original vector. We can utilize this knowledge to put values in correct places:
In our example it is:
This works in the following way: for every position we ask whether there are at least
elements not greater than
and we choose minimum of
values. So we basically try to insert values in their places and we need to use
function to select lowest possible value for every place.
Complexity
As you can see, this algorithm needs temporary variables. Assuming that
our algorithm uses linear space. If it is not true that
then it makes no sense using this algorithm but the same happens with casual counting sort. There is no use to sort numbers using this algorithm when the domain is really big.
Summary
We already know two sorting algorithms. Their implementation is rather straightforward and really resembles the imperative counterparts. As an exercise you might want to implement other imperative algorithms using similar approach.